←back to thread

IMG_0001

(walzr.com)
1861 points walz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
kannonboy ◴[] No.42314852[source]
I love that the view count is included in the minimalist UI. I came across one with zero views, and there's something so intimate and exciting about being the first person to watch an ancient home video (even if it's shaky handycam footage of a horse, narrated in Russian).

As an aside, hats off to Google to being able to serve an 11 year old video with no noticeable delay from what must be the coldest of caches.

replies(7): >>42315729 #>>42316104 #>>42316775 #>>42320216 #>>42320625 #>>42321956 #>>42328568 #
londons_explore ◴[] No.42328568[source]
> As an aside, hats off to Google to being able to serve an 11 year old video with no noticeable delay from what must be the coldest of caches.

And remember that depending if you visited with an iphone, or an android, or a smart TV, or a Chromecast, they'd be needing to serve the video with different encoding settings/codecs/MPEG profiles. So for the hardly ever watched videos, they either need to keep transcoded copies in 10+ formats, all ready to serve with no latency for years, or be ready to live transcode.

replies(1): >>42328592 #
londons_explore ◴[] No.42328592[source]
It really amazes me that they don't simply say that any video that doesn't get at least 1000 views will count towards your google drive storage quota.

Keeping all that private and never watched video ready-to-serve must cost so much, with zero revenue.

replies(1): >>42328663 #
throwaway2037 ◴[] No.42328663[source]
I think they will/are using it for AI/ML training. After all, it is data created by a human, so useful in the newly polluted sea of AI generated content.
replies(1): >>42329422 #
londons_explore ◴[] No.42329422{3}[source]
Doubt data uploaded 10+ years ago has the necessary agreements in place, at least in countries like Europe/UK requiring user consent for processing of private data.

Collecting data for one purpose (video sharing site), but then using it for another (training AI) is very much verboten.

They can probably use the public stuff tho.

replies(1): >>42428906 #
1. Mraedis ◴[] No.42428906{4}[source]
But it's under an account, an account that can receive notices about ToS and such. Wouldn't that cover this?