←back to thread

IMG_0001

(walzr.com)
1861 points walz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
kannonboy ◴[] No.42314852[source]
I love that the view count is included in the minimalist UI. I came across one with zero views, and there's something so intimate and exciting about being the first person to watch an ancient home video (even if it's shaky handycam footage of a horse, narrated in Russian).

As an aside, hats off to Google to being able to serve an 11 year old video with no noticeable delay from what must be the coldest of caches.

replies(7): >>42315729 #>>42316104 #>>42316775 #>>42320216 #>>42320625 #>>42321956 #>>42328568 #
mattlondon ◴[] No.42316775[source]
I felt slightly uneasy myself - the first thing I saw was a mum laying on her bed doing a selfie-video with two small kids (probably between 2 and 4 years old) singing a song to daddy.

That felt like a total invasion of their private lives.

I've had the same videos from my own kids, and while there is nothing embarrassing or shameful about it, it's not something I'd want broadcasted. Maybe it hit a nerve for me as it is so very very similar to my own life right now. Sure yeah they uploaded it to YouTube and it's public but it still felt wrong to watch that.

Kinda ruined my day a bit - feel kinda bad for viewing it.

replies(11): >>42316879 #>>42316894 #>>42317594 #>>42317650 #>>42317802 #>>42318306 #>>42318344 #>>42320584 #>>42323459 #>>42323561 #>>42325456 #
stronglikedan ◴[] No.42318306[source]
> That felt like a total invasion of their private lives.

Except they literally explicitly uploaded it to YT.

replies(2): >>42318370 #>>42322502 #
kelnos ◴[] No.42322502[source]
Who says it was explicit? They may have done so without understanding the implications.

Your insistence that people did this intentionally, fully understanding what they were doing, is pretty weird. You have no idea why people uploaded these, what their level of technical proficiency was when they did so, or what they understood about the availability of the videos they posted.

Maybe don't claim to read people's minds, and be open to the idea that people do things for a variety of reasons, and often don't consider (or even know that they should consider) the implications of everything they do.

replies(1): >>42375511 #
1. johnnyanmac ◴[] No.42375511[source]
> They may have done so without understanding the implications.

this may have even been pre-Google, so yes. You would have needed to create a youtube account, sign its TOS, and then press the corresponding options to upload a video to the internet. I don't think even back then people just auto-uploaded everything on heir phone; YT had pretty strict limits at that time anyway.