←back to thread

IMG_0001

(walzr.com)
1861 points walz | 1 comments | 04 Dec 24 04:46 UTC | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
paxys ◴[04 Dec 24 05:54 UTC] No.42314804[source]▶
The craziest thing to me is how...clean these results are. No nudity. No porn. No gore. Nothing overly sensitive. There is no doubt that so much of that stuff would have been initially uploaded but blocked by YouTube's filters. There are a million hours of video uploaded to the service every day, and they have built the infrastructure to analyze every single frame. When people ask why there are no viable competitors to YouTube – this is your answer.
replies(5): >>42314817 #>>42314888 #>>42316406 #>>42317094 #>>42321908 #
1. semperdark ◴[04 Dec 24 20:50 UTC] No.42321908[source]▶
Not sure it's quite so clean. My first was a a girl in underwear standing in front of a wall and turning while introducing herself "My name is __ and I am 19 years old..."