←back to thread

IMG_0001

(walzr.com)
1570 points walz | 3 comments | 04 Dec 24 04:46 UTC | HN request time: 0.623s | source
Show context
paxys ◴[04 Dec 24 05:54 UTC] No.42314804[source]▶
The craziest thing to me is how...clean these results are. No nudity. No porn. No gore. Nothing overly sensitive. There is no doubt that so much of that stuff would have been initially uploaded but blocked by YouTube's filters. There are a million hours of video uploaded to the service every day, and they have built the infrastructure to analyze every single frame. When people ask why there are no viable competitors to YouTube – this is your answer.
replies(5): >>42314817 #>>42314888 #>>42316406 #>>42317094 #>>42321908 #
ffsm8 ◴[04 Dec 24 06:17 UTC] No.42314888[source]▶
Doubtful, it's likely just a game of numbers.

There is endless amounts of coomer content on YouTube like

  * Nude yoga
  * Body painting
  * Nude massages 
  * Transparent x haul / try on
You're just a million times more likely to get non-coomer content when it's been uploaded via iPhones upload to YouTube button during 2009-2014.

Heck, that was a time before onlyfans etc, so the primary coomer stuff on Reddit etc was produced by exhibitionists vs people just milking simps

replies(1): >>42315038 #
rblatz ◴[04 Dec 24 06:53 UTC] No.42315038[source]▶
For those like me who had no idea what coomer means, it’s a weird meme about men that failed no nut November. It seems popular in alt-right circles.
replies(2): >>42315126 #>>42321850 #
ffsm8 ◴[04 Dec 24 07:09 UTC] No.42315126[source]▶
Not sure where you're getting that alt-right circle from, it's just regular Internet lingo. Unless you consider people like Hasan alt-right too? Would be mind-blowing for sure, but hey, to reach their own.

Got popular during the pandemic, though it predates it

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Coomer

replies(2): >>42315791 #>>42320172 #
1. bertylicious ◴[04 Dec 24 09:15 UTC] No.42315791[source]▶
The idea itself is so regressive and shaming, I don't find it surprising at all that the political right is drawn to it.
replies(1): >>42321866 #
2. aprilthird2021 ◴[04 Dec 24 20:45 UTC] No.42321866[source]▶
The idea of being a horny guy online and content existing for horny guys online is regressive and shaming?
replies(1): >>42322920 #
3. kelnos ◴[04 Dec 24 22:49 UTC] No.42322920[source]▶
I think GP meant that stigmatizing the idea of a coomer is regressive and shaming, in that it's sex-negative -- if someone wants to masturbate excessively, there's nothing wrong with that, as long as it's not negatively impacting other aspects of their life. Not sure I agree with that take, but I think that's what they were talking about.