←back to thread

IMG_0001

(walzr.com)
1570 points walz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
paxys ◴[] No.42314804[source]
The craziest thing to me is how...clean these results are. No nudity. No porn. No gore. Nothing overly sensitive. There is no doubt that so much of that stuff would have been initially uploaded but blocked by YouTube's filters. There are a million hours of video uploaded to the service every day, and they have built the infrastructure to analyze every single frame. When people ask why there are no viable competitors to YouTube – this is your answer.
replies(5): >>42314817 #>>42314888 #>>42316406 #>>42317094 #>>42321908 #
1. beernet ◴[] No.42314817[source]
Automated filtering surely is not across the main competitive advantages of youtube.