←back to thread

146 points belter | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
hn_throwaway_99 ◴[] No.42309473[source]
I have to wonder if stuff like this will, over time, force companies to be extremely wary of any tech that eventually falls into the "extremely difficult to remove" category, and have companies instead requiring open source solutions and then separate contracts with support companies for those solutions.

It's just further re-emphasizing that it doesn't matter how good your vendor is now, they will probably eventually get acquired by a company attempting to squeeze every last penny out of you. And their cost-benefit calculation is no longer based on how much unique value the software is providing, but it's instead about how much of a PITA it is to migrate off said software.

replies(3): >>42309532 #>>42309563 #>>42313837 #
1. QuiDortDine ◴[] No.42313837[source]
You just described vendor lock-in. It's never fun, but it's usually a known factor for any competent decision-makers. Sometimes "good for now" is good enough...