←back to thread

146 points belter | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
glitchc ◴[] No.42308466[source]
Wouldn't a slow boil have been better than a massive price hike? Raising the price by 50% would be palatable to most medium to large orgs as the cost to switch is greater. And it would still net a nice chunk of change for Broadcom.
replies(2): >>42308505 #>>42308519 #
cjbgkagh ◴[] No.42308505[source]
That would give people time to leave, this is a gouging from people who are forced to pay because it takes them a long time to engineer around it. You cant repeatedly gouge them so better make it count.
replies(1): >>42308628 #
eastbound ◴[] No.42308628[source]
Can’t wait to see when AWS does it. Because it will happen to others, to every single Cloud product. Or GitHub or Atlassian.
replies(2): >>42308832 #>>42309582 #
1. outworlder ◴[] No.42309582[source]
> Can’t wait to see when AWS does it.

AWS overcharges for traffic, specially traffic going out.

However, they have repeatedly released instances that are cheaper than their predecessors (often, higher performing too). I don't think that's out of the goodness of their hearts, as it likely allows them to refresh their fleet more often than it would be the case otherwise.

If you are large they will work with you on pretty sweet discounts.

So far, there's been no indications that they will pull the same move. They might, but that would be surprising. VMWare has never been cheap though.