←back to thread

482 points sanqui | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.807s | source
Show context
danpalmer ◴[] No.42285229[source]
This is a bad look. I expected the result would be Chrome and Firefox dropping trust for this CA, but they already don't trust this CA. Arguably, Microsoft/Windows trusting a CA that the other big players choose not to trust is an even worse look for Microsoft.
replies(8): >>42285389 #>>42285408 #>>42285431 #>>42285622 #>>42286061 #>>42286142 #>>42286897 #>>42287654 #
jsheard ◴[] No.42285389[source]
What is even the point of a web CA that isn't trusted by all of the major players? Is there one?
replies(3): >>42285424 #>>42285444 #>>42285550 #
1. beeflet ◴[] No.42285424[source]
I suppose it allows you to enable third party control and censorship. If you look at microsoft's censorship of bing in china for example, they are more than willing to bend the knee if it means they can get ahead.
replies(1): >>42285660 #
2. alganet ◴[] No.42285660[source]
As a brazillian, I find this very unlikely.

In 2013, when the same party was in power, SERPRO was tasked with replacing Microsoft in key aspects, such as government email (which was handled by Outlook Server at that time) and operating systems.

The main reason was fear of espionage. So, in reality, we are more afraid of the US spying on us than random internet dissidents.

replies(1): >>42286217 #
3. serial_dev ◴[] No.42286217[source]
As a non Brazilian, sometimes when a government says a company is spying on its citizens, they mean that they want access, too, to the spying and censoring apparatus.
replies(1): >>42286312 #
4. alganet ◴[] No.42286312{3}[source]
I see your point.

Maybe if I was in government I would think the same. Catch criminals before they act, stuff like that (I'm just being the devil's advocate here).

This is a dillema, and the worst kind. The kind citizens know nothing about, so the only possible way to talk about it is to speculate. I am, however, too old to speculate about these things anymore.