←back to thread

412 points tafda | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dogprez ◴[] No.42247609[source]
She makes some good points, but my take is that we in the 21st century are more bound to the success of our weakest links. Our world has become so complicated, one small mistake can have dire consequences. So, it's the state's priority to spend its limited resources helping those struggling to tread water. Gifted children will get the stimulus they need at home via independent study or from their family. I know since I gave myself an almost complete college education in computer science before I graduated from high school. Splitting gifted kids apart can warp them socially for life too.
replies(6): >>42247681 #>>42247709 #>>42247733 #>>42247751 #>>42247764 #>>42247775 #
Dilettante_ ◴[] No.42247709[source]
>Gifted children will get the stimulus they need at home via independent study or from their family.

That's extremely optimistic.

replies(1): >>42247760 #
nostrademons ◴[] No.42247760[source]
Well-off gifted kids will get the stimulus they need at home. Poor gifted kids are out of luck. And thus, the policy serves to entrench socioeconomic disadvantage in the name of making everybody equal.
replies(1): >>42247896 #
dogprez ◴[] No.42247896{3}[source]
I don't believe it. Almost every kid in America has access to the internet, a public library and a teacher. How many don't have access to any of those? That's a different problem.
replies(2): >>42248312 #>>42248335 #
1. SpicyLemonZest ◴[] No.42248312{4}[source]
But they often don't have an easy way to get to the library, or a quiet place where they can sit and watch a Youtube tutor, or even a trusted authority who tells them that all of this is worth their time.