←back to thread

412 points tafda | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
atomicUpdate ◴[] No.42247713[source]
> There’s little doubt that racism played a role in identifying children as gifted even though the label was based on supposedly objective criteria.

Why has the LA Times settled on racist teachers as the only reason for the skew in enrollment numbers, and why aren’t teachers upset the LA Times are calling them racists?

I’m constantly surprised how often accusations like this are thrown around and how little pushback there is by those accused of it.

replies(9): >>42247758 #>>42247763 #>>42247893 #>>42247947 #>>42248025 #>>42248046 #>>42248127 #>>42248199 #>>42248778 #
1. Jcampuzano2 ◴[] No.42248127[source]
It's really surprising they can't make the logical conclusion from what they wrote that they just point blank accused teachers as being racist.

So are we saying that teachers purposely disproportionately identified asian and white students as gifted? Can we not just admit that asian and white students usually have more learning resources provided to them during their younger years (both due to cultural and economic reasons) and thus in a typical classroom they will be the more likely to stand out academically before jumping to the race card. They've decided to skip straight past logic and straight to identity issues this time.

I am a "white-passing" latino (i.e. nobody assumes I'm latino until they hear my last name) and I was in the gifted program in California growing up. Plenty of the people also part of that program were black or latino themselves.