←back to thread

412 points tafda | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.498s | source
Show context
dogprez ◴[] No.42247609[source]
She makes some good points, but my take is that we in the 21st century are more bound to the success of our weakest links. Our world has become so complicated, one small mistake can have dire consequences. So, it's the state's priority to spend its limited resources helping those struggling to tread water. Gifted children will get the stimulus they need at home via independent study or from their family. I know since I gave myself an almost complete college education in computer science before I graduated from high school. Splitting gifted kids apart can warp them socially for life too.
replies(6): >>42247681 #>>42247709 #>>42247733 #>>42247751 #>>42247764 #>>42247775 #
marcus0x62 ◴[] No.42247764[source]
> but my take is that we in the 21st century are more bound to the success of our weakest links.

Bound in what way? Gated by? Morally obligated to?

replies(2): >>42247917 #>>42248081 #
1. dogprez ◴[] No.42247917[source]
It's just the truth. Look at the boeing dreamliner failures. Hundreds of smart people doing a bang up job. It just took one a few missteps to jeopardize the whole production and peoples lives.