←back to thread

398 points emersonrsantos | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mschuster91 ◴[] No.42225102[source]
The fact how simple it is to re-implement a large part of Docker because all it fundamentally is a bit of glue code to the kernel is the biggest problem Docker-the-company faced and still faces.

Where Docker adds real value is not (just) Docker Hub but Docker for Windows and Mac. The integrations offer a vastly superior experience than messing around with VirtualBox and Vagrant by hand (been there, done that) to achieve running Docker on one's development machine.

replies(9): >>42225135 #>>42225179 #>>42225190 #>>42225192 #>>42225204 #>>42225325 #>>42225397 #>>42226422 #>>42227107 #
dilyevsky ◴[] No.42225397[source]
Nah, they should have prioritized building some sort of PaaS solution like CloudRun, Render or Fly so they can sell that to enterprises for $$$. Instead they did half-baked docker swarm which never really worked reliably and then lost ground to k8s rapidly
replies(3): >>42225482 #>>42225720 #>>42225940 #
jen20 ◴[] No.42225482[source]
Didn’t they buy at least one of these? It was garbage, and no one cared.
replies(1): >>42231464 #
1. dilyevsky ◴[] No.42231464{3}[source]
dotCloud was actually what Docker came out of. No one cared because they didn’t prioritize it enough to make it good
replies(1): >>42233703 #
2. jen20 ◴[] No.42233703[source]
Orchard was the one I was thinking of.