←back to thread

151 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
ngriffiths ◴[] No.42193839[source]
Makes me curious what state R was at the time, or whatever else could've been useful for deep learning, and the benefits of a new language vs adapting something that exists. Seems like it was a big investment
replies(2): >>42193979 #>>42194909 #
antononcube ◴[] No.42193979[source]
R and its ecosystem have some unbeatable features, but, generally speaking, the "old", base R is too arcane to be widely useful. Also, being "made by statisticians for statisticians" should be a big warning sign.
replies(2): >>42214137 #>>42228883 #
1. wdkrnls ◴[] No.42228883[source]
On the contrary, I find base R less arcane than the current de jour python libraries which copied it