←back to thread

Bocker: Docker implemented in around 100 lines of Bash (2015)

(github.com)
398 points emersonrsantos | 10 comments | 23 Nov 24 23:18 UTC | HN request time: 0.209s | source | bottom
1. dcreater ◴[24 Nov 24 01:29 UTC] No.42225283[source]▶
Very interesting. With how standard containerization has become, we sorely need an FOSS solution
replies(3): >>42225328 #>>42225331 #>>42225334 #
2. MrDrMcCoy ◴[24 Nov 24 01:37 UTC] No.42225328[source]▶
Why not podman?
replies(1): >>42225724 #
3. wmf ◴[24 Nov 24 01:37 UTC] No.42225331[source]▶
If Docker isn't open enough for you, check out Podman (now with extra CNCF).
replies(2): >>42225352 #>>42225424 #
4. tsujamin ◴[24 Nov 24 01:38 UTC] No.42225334[source]▶
Don’t we have them? I only casually use containers, but what about podman, runc, systemd-nspawn, LXC etc?
5. ◴[24 Nov 24 01:43 UTC] No.42225352[source]▶
6. hackernewds ◴[24 Nov 24 02:04 UTC] No.42225424[source]▶
how is docker open in any way?

https://i.imgur.com/2F0JmUw.png

replies(3): >>42225439 #>>42225948 #>>42227348 #
7. diggan ◴[24 Nov 24 02:09 UTC] No.42225439{3}[source]▶
In this way: https://imgur.com/a/PIkm7Eb
8. osigurdson ◴[24 Nov 24 03:28 UTC] No.42225724[source]▶
Agree. Not sure about mac but on Windows, Podman + WSL works well. No need for podman desktop either, the cli vwrsion is fine.
9. mardifoufs ◴[24 Nov 24 04:39 UTC] No.42225948{3}[source]▶
How exactly is docker (buildkit, compose, the runtime, the daemon, etc) not open source? Docker desktop isn't, but that's almost entirely unrelated to the containerization technology that it uses or that people refer to when they talk about docker.
10. ndsipa_pomu ◴[24 Nov 24 11:28 UTC] No.42227348{3}[source]▶
That service agreement is for using the Docker Desktop GUI tool which isn't open source (though free to use for small businesses etc) whereas the basic docker CLI commands are all open source.