←back to thread

90 points amichail | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.352s | source
Show context
Larrikin ◴[] No.42205555[source]
I just don't get the obsession with eliminating the numpad. There are tons of interesting looking and innovative keyboards now and they all insist on making them as cramped as possible.

It makes sense on a laptop. But, if I already need to have a clear place on my desk for the keyboard and mouse, I'd rather just use an extra 2 inches to have the full size keyboard with the numpad and arrow keys that are not crammed against the rest of the keyboard.

replies(23): >>42205613 #>>42205614 #>>42205623 #>>42205624 #>>42205626 #>>42205662 #>>42205672 #>>42205850 #>>42206003 #>>42206244 #>>42206524 #>>42206657 #>>42206972 #>>42206999 #>>42207048 #>>42207093 #>>42207253 #>>42207254 #>>42207331 #>>42207439 #>>42207645 #>>42207723 #>>42211690 #
jermaustin1 ◴[] No.42205850[source]
Same. I use my numpad constantly - Excel, programming, VoIP, calc, etc.

I don't use the number row above my keyboard except on rare occasions or to type the shifted characters. If I need to quickly type a number without looking, the numpad is the only way to do that (for me).

I tried a friends "compact" gaming keyboard, and then to the right of his keyboard was a separate "macro" keyboard which was basically just a numpad... so why not just have a numpad?

replies(2): >>42207235 #>>42212643 #
1. Ferret7446 ◴[] No.42212643[source]
You could just get a separate numpad...

Numpads are specialist equipment now that data entry is much less common than the past, as everything is digitized/scanned.

The other advantage of a separate numpad is that you can position it for better ergonomics; a full sized keyboard usually forces either the mouse or the keyboard into a more awkward position.