←back to thread

514 points gslin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
pests ◴[] No.42191619[source]
It feels like just yesterday I was paying for certs, or worst, just running without.

Can't believe its been ten years.

replies(1): >>42191666 #
ozim ◴[] No.42191666[source]
Can’t believe there are still anti TLS weirdos.
replies(7): >>42191688 #>>42191718 #>>42191893 #>>42192714 #>>42192733 #>>42193057 #>>42193614 #
dijit ◴[] No.42191688[source]
The digital equivalent of a local kebab shop menu does not need encryption.

The lack of understanding from us as technologists for people who would have had a working site and are now forced into either: an oligopoly of site hosting companies, or, for their site to break consistently as TLS standards rotate is one thing that brings me shame about our community.

You can come up with all kinds of reasons to gatekeep website hosting, “they have to update anyway” even when updating means reinstallion of an OS, “its not that hard to rotate” say people with deep knowledge of computers, “just get someone else to do it” say people who have a financial interest in it being that way.

Framing people with legitimate issues as weirdo’s is not as charming as you think it is.

replies(6): >>42191746 #>>42191752 #>>42191760 #>>42191778 #>>42191785 #>>42191894 #
pests ◴[] No.42191746[source]
You say that until some foreign national gets their kabab order MITM to deliver them some malicious virus that ends up getting him killed.
replies(1): >>42192959 #
account42 ◴[] No.42192959[source]
Which is of course a real concern for the average joe.
replies(1): >>42210465 #
1. pests ◴[] No.42210465[source]
I wish for all my fellow humans to be safe, just because it doesn't protect me personally doesn't mean I think it's not a concern.