←back to thread

311 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
adontz ◴[] No.42202248[source]
This is a good example of "stringly typed" software. Golang designers did not want exceptions (still have them with panic/recover), but untyped errors are evil. On the other hand, how would one process typed errors without pattern matching? Because "catch" in most languages is a [rudimentary] pattern matching.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-ref...

replies(1): >>42202266 #
KRAKRISMOTT ◴[] No.42202266[source]
Go has typed errors, it just didn't use it in this case.
replies(7): >>42202277 #>>42202378 #>>42202617 #>>42203319 #>>42205600 #>>42206561 #>>42208318 #
1. stouset ◴[] No.42208318[source]
Go didn't have them at the time.

Pessimistically this is yet another example of the language's authors relearning why other languages have the features they do one problem at a time.