←back to thread

161 points roboboffin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.237s | source
Show context
outworlder ◴[] No.42198355[source]
So, an inherently error-prone computation is being corrected by another very error prone computation?
replies(3): >>42198861 #>>42198868 #>>42198986 #
leptons ◴[] No.42198861[source]
I've never seen so much money spent on a fundamentally flawed tech, since maybe Theranos. I'm really starting to doubt the viability of the current crop of quantum computing attempts. I think there probably is some way to harness quantum effects, but I'm not sure computing with inherently high margin of error is the right way to do it.
replies(4): >>42199092 #>>42199157 #>>42200990 #>>42207632 #
1. zeroxfe ◴[] No.42207632[source]
> fundamentally flawed tech, since maybe Theranos

That's a pretty dramatic claim. We've had to (and still have to) deal with the same class of problems when going from analog -> digital in chips, communications, optics, etc. etc. The primitives that reality gives us to work with are not discrete.