←back to thread

Does the Internet Route Around Damage? – Baltic Sea Cable Cuts

(labs.ripe.net)
123 points voytec | 2 comments | 20 Nov 24 18:30 UTC | HN request time: 0.425s | source
Show context
niemandhier ◴[21 Nov 24 07:40 UTC] No.42202012[source]▶
I have workloads on hetzner data centers in Finnland and Germany. Hetzner owns part of that cable, to connect those sites.

Tracerout gives me a path like this spine5.cloud2.fsn1.hetzner.com -> core22.fsn1.hetzner.com -> core5.fra.hetzner.com -> core53.sto.hetzner.com -> core31.hel1.hetzner.com

Which is worse than before, but still works for me.

replies(1): >>42202523 #
voytec ◴[21 Nov 24 09:26 UTC] No.42202523[source]▶
My route from Poland to dedi box leased from Hetzner in Finland currently goes through AS1299 / twelve99.net (Warsaw->Talinn->Helsinki) peering, and there's a slight increase in latency since the cable cut. On a normal day, it's Poland -> Hetzner in Germany -> Hetzner in Finland. I'm guessing that the situation hurts companies like Hetzner financially.
replies(3): >>42202673 #>>42204657 #>>42204854 #
1. hulitu ◴[21 Nov 24 09:57 UTC] No.42202673[source]▶
> I'm guessing that the situation hurts companies like Hetzner financially.

So maybe, in the end, is a Hetzner competitor who profits from those "cable cuts". /s Just follow the money.

replies(1): >>42203693 #
2. FollowingTheDao ◴[21 Nov 24 12:33 UTC] No.42203693[source]▶
I think you have to follow the really big money.

What if these cuts were meant to route traffic through a specific network to intecept data?