←back to thread

311 points thunderbong | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
hambes ◴[] No.42202204[source]
Solution to the specifically mentioned problem: Don't use string-based errors, use sentinel errors [1].

More generally: Don't produce code where consumers of your API are the least bit inclined to rely on non-technical strings. Instead use first-level language constructs like predefined error values, types or even constants that contain the non-technical string so that API consumers can compare the return value againnst the constant instead of hard-coding the contained string themselves.

Hyrum's Law is definitely a thing, but its effects can be mitigated.

[1]: https://thomas-guettler.de/go/wrapping-and-sentinel-errors

replies(7): >>42202257 #>>42202260 #>>42202261 #>>42202464 #>>42202551 #>>42202608 #>>42212195 #
1. cedws ◴[] No.42202551[source]
Code that checks raw error strings is just plain bad and should be exempt from Go’s backwards compatibility guarantees. There is almost never an excuse for it, especially in stdlib.