←back to thread

154 points lr0 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
Aloha ◴[] No.42201812[source]
The issue is the outmoded and excessively specific system of procurement used by the US Military - one more or less mandated by congress.

We can chose to alter how we procure, but there are good reasons why the system is as it is, so a careful effort to understand why it is like it is before we reform must be undertaken.

Chesterton's Fence applies here for sure.

replies(1): >>42202313 #
KennyBlanken ◴[] No.42202313[source]
Congress does not stop the US military from "keeping a database of historical prices, obtaining supplier quotes or identifying commercially similar parts."

Those procedures do not happen because generals retire into cushy barely-show jobs at defense contractors

Congress does not dare force the US military to do any of the above because the US military is a giant pork barrel welfare program for red states, especially the midwestern ones, feeding them endless useless manufacturing work and keeping all their unskilled-labor high school graduates out of unemployment - sending them into the military where they learn some semblance of how to be an adult and some skills

replies(2): >>42202374 #>>42202488 #
1. kasey_junk ◴[] No.42202488[source]
You’ve got that backwards, at least in some instances. The military pretty regularly tells Congress it doesn’t want something and Congress keeps buying it to keep constituents happy: https://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/12/18/congress-agai...

You also wrong about where the money goes. It mostly goes to coastal states (and DC). The Midwest gets less money from those contracts than most states: https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/...