←back to thread

131 points CharlesW | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
veidr ◴[] No.42200676[source]
So this aspires to be something like Tauri, but with Zig for the fast/native bits, and leaning harder on and more opinionated about the frontend/UI part?

That's a pretty interesting proposal, but also a staggeringly huge amount of work.

replies(1): >>42200712 #
yoav ◴[] No.42200712[source]
It’s only been a few months but yes it’s a huge undertaking.

I’m only picking up steam though and my whole career has been taking on these kinds of huge projects so it’s just getting started.

replies(1): >>42200750 #
veidr ◴[] No.42200750[source]
Awesome. :) Good luck.

I think it's a really attractive package for an early-stage one-person project. Nice docs, and cute bunny.

FWIW, it also seems super-sensible to focus on Mac only for now, and get the basics working well there — a good Mac DX could provide the traction/momentum to get more contributors to help build out the obvious cross-platform promise.

replies(2): >>42201283 #>>42201314 #
1. klabb3 ◴[] No.42201283[source]
> it also seems super-sensible to focus on Mac only for now

I’m the first guy to agree to reduced scope, but unfortunately the reality of cross platform is that the subtle details affect the APIs, and once you add more platforms, you can realize issues too late. As a simple example, MacOS has a concept of “showing/activating the app” whereas Windows has… well individual windows. They add up, especially if you add mobile to the mix.

I think the most sensible is to keep the api surface small, and also to peek at electron, tauri etc to learn and try not making expensive mistakes.