←back to thread

383 points bookstore-romeo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
ggm ◴[] No.42199341[source]
Not wanting to over-do it, but is there possibly an argument the data about geospatial should be in the commons and google have some obligation to put the data back into the commons?

I'm not arguing to a legal basis but if it's crowdsourced, then the inputs came from ordinary people. Sure, they signed to T&Cs.

Philosophically, I think knowledge, facts of the world as it is, even the constructed world, should be public knowledge not an asset class in itself.

replies(6): >>42199425 #>>42199684 #>>42199814 #>>42200059 #>>42200860 #>>42201153 #
urbandw311er ◴[] No.42199684[source]
I’ve been saying this about Google Maps for years, especially their vast collection of public transport loading data and real time road speeds.

People are duped into thinking they’re doing some “greater good” by completing the in-app surveys and yet the data they give back is for Google’s exclusive use and, in fact, deepens their moat.

replies(3): >>42199732 #>>42200438 #>>42200754 #
alwayslikethis ◴[] No.42200754[source]
IIRC Google maps basically does not make money. I wonder if there can be a government deal to subsidize it on the condition that the data be open sourced.
replies(2): >>42200989 #>>42201058 #
1. ipaddr ◴[] No.42200989[source]
Google maps would if it sold the data to Google. My guess is there is a line item for that or at least on paper for tax purposes.