←back to thread

With Core One, Prusa's Open Source Hardware Dream Dies

(hackaday.com)
106 points iancmceachern | 3 comments | 20 Nov 24 20:35 UTC | HN request time: 0.662s | source
Show context
ShakataGaNai ◴[20 Nov 24 21:22 UTC] No.42198252[source]▶
There are too many cheap clones. Too much stealing of the open source work. This isn't remotely shocking, just look at Redis, Elastic and many many others... Open Source works until it doesn't.

I don't buy Prusa because they are OSH, I buy them because they are great printers. They are an open platform, if not open source. Which is good enough for my needs. If these changes they are making will allow Prusa to keep producing world class devices at reasonable prices, then more power to them.

And yes, I know some people hate Prusa or have had major issues. But they do a lot to move 3D printing forward, rising tide lifts all boats and all that jazz. We want all respectable and reputable 3D printer companies to succeed - because then everyone wins.

replies(6): >>42198377 #>>42198400 #>>42198411 #>>42198440 #>>42198674 #>>42199988 #
TaylorAlexander ◴[21 Nov 24 01:11 UTC] No.42199988[source]▶
Prusa gave everyone permission to make copies of their i3 series machines, make modifications, and distribute modified versions. It’s not theft if you have been given explicit permission to make copies.

“You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty.”

“You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above.”

https://github.com/prusa3d/Original-Prusa-i3/blob/MK3S/LICEN...

replies(1): >>42200883 #
1. aleph_minus_one ◴[21 Nov 24 03:43 UTC] No.42200883[source]▶
> Prusa gave everyone permission to make copies of their i3 series machines, make modifications, and distribute modified versions. It’s not theft if you have been given explicit permission to make copies.

Indeed. But I guess Prusa also expected that people will buy the original such that this support this open-source mission can be sustained. This is where I personally see Prusa's fallacy of thinking.

replies(1): >>42201242 #
2. TaylorAlexander ◴[21 Nov 24 04:52 UTC] No.42201242[source]▶
Sure, their choice to give it away may not have gone as they hoped, I’m just pushing back against the idea that making copies of a thing the creator explicitly gave permission to copy is “stealing”. The core of open source is that making and distributing modified or unmodified copies is good. Calling it stealing undermines the very important social work we can do with open source.
replies(1): >>42202614 #
3. aleph_minus_one ◴[21 Nov 24 09:47 UTC] No.42202614[source]▶
> The core of open source is that making and distributing modified or unmodified copies is good.

The core is not that it is "good", only that it is allowed (i.e. we won't sue you if you do).