←back to thread

157 points galeos | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.216s | source
Show context
yalok ◴[] No.42196490[source]
So basically the idea is to pack 3 ternary weights (-1,0,1) into 5 bits instead of 6, but they compare the results with fp16 model which would use 48 bits for those 3 weights…

And speed up comes from the memory io, compensated a bit by the need to unpack these weights before using them…

Did I get this right?

replies(1): >>42197301 #
UncleOxidant ◴[] No.42197301[source]
Yeah, that seems to be the case. Though, I suspect Microsoft is interested in implementing something like a custom RISC-V CPU that has an ALU that's tuned for doing this ternary math and added custom vector/matrix instructions. Something like that could save them a lot of power in their data centers.

If it were to catch on then perhaps we'd see Intel, AMD, ARM adding math ops optimized for doing ternary math?

replies(1): >>42200664 #
1. yalok ◴[] No.42200664[source]
my dream is to see ternary support at the HW wire level - that'd be even more power efficient, and transistor count may be less...