←back to thread

How Google spent 15 years creating a culture of concealment

(www.nytimes.com)
156 points tysone | 1 comments | 20 Nov 24 11:45 UTC | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
lxgr ◴[20 Nov 24 23:48 UTC] No.42199412[source]▶
> put “attorney-client privileged” on documents and to always add a Google lawyer to the list of recipients, even if no legal questions were involved and the lawyer never responded

Wow. One of the very first things I learned when onboarding to a US company is that the client-attorney privilege does not work like that at all.

“Privileged and confidential” is not a legal shibboleth (especially not when used so incorrectly).

replies(4): >>42199540 #>>42200154 #>>42200426 #>>42200574 #
1. Ferret7446 ◴[21 Nov 24 02:44 UTC] No.42200574[source]▶
I suspect "put “attorney-client privileged” on documents" is only a policy in specific areas within Google due to poor leadership in those specific areas, and that's being magnified for clicks/outrage.