←back to thread

How good are American roads?

(www.construction-physics.com)
192 points chmaynard | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.418s | source
Show context
rconti ◴[] No.42196461[source]
> Interestingly, in all cases urban roads are worse quality than rural roads, presumably because they see higher traffic than rural roads.

There's more infrastructure under urban roads. Crews come in to fix some utility, shred a section of a lane, patch it poorly with dissimilar materials, and leave.

replies(12): >>42196522 #>>42196736 #>>42197205 #>>42197899 #>>42198008 #>>42198655 #>>42198873 #>>42199005 #>>42199037 #>>42200024 #>>42201080 #>>42201777 #
bluGill ◴[] No.42196522[source]
Rural roads are often unpaved. The local authority has to come by regularly with a grade to redo things or they become unusable quickly. Overall this is by far the cheapest way to have a road, but it doesn't scale to high use and city folks demand something that makes less dust. Rural roads also includes minimum maintance roads which demand 4wd (real 4wd, many SUVs will have trouble) when the weather is nice and a winch is a must when things get rainy or snowy.

Though given his definition of quality I expect he is actually ignoring all the real rural roads and only talking about major roads which while they get less traffic than urban roads are maintained to similar standards.

replies(7): >>42196647 #>>42196685 #>>42197519 #>>42197529 #>>42198276 #>>42199536 #>>42199548 #
nozzlegear ◴[] No.42197529[source]
> Rural roads are often unpaved.

Like the other replies have indicated, I'm not so sure this is the case? I live in very rural northwest Iowa, and while there are certainly plenty of gravel roads around here, I'm only driving on them if I'm intentionally trying to go "off the beaten path." You'll take a gravel road if you live on a farm, or you're trying to get to somewhere secluded such as a lake, campground or maybe a county park; but (imo) it's rare for the average person to drive down a gravel road just going from Point A to Point B on their daily commute.

replies(3): >>42197681 #>>42197707 #>>42197716 #
dullcrisp ◴[] No.42197707[source]
Do most people in rural areas not live on a farm? Excuse my ignorance but genuine question.
replies(5): >>42197752 #>>42197842 #>>42197970 #>>42199275 #>>42200627 #
ssl-3 ◴[] No.42197752[source]
The people of the United States are broadly free to build a home wherever they can afford to, comrade, including on land that would otherwise be used for farming.

(Actual answer: I know a bunch of people who live in houses in the middle of seemingly-nowhere in rural Ohio, and almost none of them farm anything at all. They just seem to like the space and the quiet and the desolate isolation.

The only farmer who I know is my parents' neighbor, who has a house few miles away from their place.)

replies(2): >>42197978 #>>42200430 #
fragmede ◴[] No.42200430[source]
I like your version of America. Sadly, California's not that free. Some billionaire can't just buy up some land and just put in apartment/office/factory tower as they please, the local government and residents just aren't going to stand for that.
replies(1): >>42200519 #
1. ssl-3 ◴[] No.42200519[source]
That billionaire can probably just buy up some land and put their house there, though, since "affordability" is not part of the equation.

(Some adjustments may have to be made, but that's only another also-irrelevant expense.)

replies(2): >>42200543 #>>42201767 #
2. fragmede ◴[] No.42200543[source]
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-07-22/silicon-... is what I'm referring to
3. thaumasiotes ◴[] No.42201767[source]
> That billionaire can probably just buy up some land and put their house there, though, since "affordability" is not part of the equation.

Not in California; we have an entire bureau, the Coastal Commission, that exists to prevent that very thing.