←back to thread

91 points vednig | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.473s | source
Show context
slashnode ◴[] No.42199449[source]
I've been surprised by the number of companies adopting nextjs as their defacto framework without concern for the uncomfortable reality that the framework is built to be hosted on vercel with self hosting largely supported as an afterthought. It's great that opennext exists, but it really shouldn't _have_ to exist (as I believe some of the maintainers have publicly stated)
replies(6): >>42199660 #>>42199710 #>>42199736 #>>42199910 #>>42199951 #>>42200008 #
1. paxys ◴[] No.42200008[source]
I don't know why people keep saying this. There are some features of Next.js that are better supported on Vercel. That doesn't mean that you have to use Vercel. In fact if you are just building a static React site without any server components (so, 99% of sites created with Next.js) then it makes literally no difference where you deploy it.