←back to thread

New Calculation Finds we are close to the Kessler Syndrome [video]

(www.youtube.com)
93 points cratermoon | 3 comments | 20 Nov 24 20:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.685s | source
Show context
benchmarkist ◴[20 Nov 24 21:09 UTC] No.42198125[source]▶
As long as it is militarily and commercially viable then the number of satellites will continue increasing, regardless of what academics have to say about collision rates. As per usual this is a coordination problem and in case people have not noticed nations are becoming less coordinated and more insular.
replies(1): >>42198732 #
akira2501 ◴[20 Nov 24 22:21 UTC] No.42198732[source]▶
> in case people have not noticed nations are becoming less coordinated and more insular.

And what is your yardstick for measuring this? As far as I can tell this is the opposite of true. It's a popular national news meme but I don't believe it's been measured in any reliable way.

replies(3): >>42198890 #>>42199194 #>>42201389 #
benchmarkist[dead post] ◴[20 Nov 24 23:22 UTC] No.42199194[source]▶
[flagged]
Dylan16807 ◴[21 Nov 24 00:52 UTC] No.42199896[source]▶
"True" here is not a boolean, it's the truth of the matter.

The claim is that coordination is decreasing. Calling that "false" might mean coordination is steady. Calling it the "opposite of true" means that coordination is increasing.

replies(1): >>42199986 #
1. benchmarkist ◴[21 Nov 24 01:10 UTC] No.42199986[source]▶
That's a possible interpretation but the verbosity of the original statement hinders understanding the actual intent which is I why I recommended simplifying and removing unnecessary redundancies.
replies(1): >>42200076 #
2. Dylan16807 ◴[21 Nov 24 01:26 UTC] No.42200076[source]▶
It's 40 words and makes three separate points in those words. I don't think it's too verbose, and I don't think your suggestion helps.
replies(1): >>42200088 #
3. benchmarkist ◴[21 Nov 24 01:28 UTC] No.42200088[source]▶
Everyone is entitled to their opinions.