←back to thread

154 points tysone | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
more_corn ◴[] No.42198857[source]
Google 100% provided advice for concealment specifically targeted at future litigation. Gchat logs were specifically reduced company-wide explicitly to avoid court discovery.

I personally saw the advice to cc a lawyer with a legal question in order to bring a conversation under attorney client privilege.

The penalty they’re facing in now way accounts for the money they saved by concealing evidence, which basically means “keep doing it, it works!”

replies(5): >>42198996 #>>42199019 #>>42199021 #>>42199084 #>>42199575 #
1. brokenmachine ◴[] No.42199575[source]
>I personally saw the advice to cc a lawyer with a legal question in order to bring a conversation under attorney client privilege.

Does that work legally though? If it's not only sent to the lawyer then you can't really claim that it's privileged information.