←back to thread

How good are American roads?

(www.construction-physics.com)
194 points chmaynard | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
digitalsushi ◴[] No.42194555[source]
I heard a civil engineer make a claim once that the dust on the side of the road is about 300% more laden with precious metals like platinum, than random mining. I suppose this is all roads and not just American roads, though.
replies(2): >>42194600 #>>42194667 #
mikepurvis ◴[] No.42194600[source]
Isn’t it supposed to be mostly brake pads, rotors, and tire rubber?

Would be fascinating to imagine it being economically viable to vacuum up and reprocess it, but based on the above I’ve assumed it was worthless.

replies(3): >>42194625 #>>42194760 #>>42197209 #
alt227 ◴[] No.42194625[source]
Sounds a bit like the guys that collect the sludge from the sewers in jewellery and gold smithing districts in cities, then pan it for gold. Its not going to make anyone rich, but theres enough gold dust in there to buy some food and shoes for somebody hungry enough to dive into a sewer and collect sludge!
replies(1): >>42194664 #
mikepurvis ◴[] No.42194664[source]
Supermarkets that make you put in a quarter to take a shopping cart are really just paying the homeless $0.25 each to return them from the parking lot.
replies(3): >>42195147 #>>42196322 #>>42196452 #
permo-w ◴[] No.42196452[source]
in the UK, trolley deposits are much more expensive, at £1. people are more likely to retrieve a £1 than a quarter, but the atomic payout is ~5x higher, so I wonder which scenario yields better pay for the homeless
replies(2): >>42198413 #>>42198433 #
mikepurvis ◴[] No.42198433[source]
I mean ultimately the goal is to find a balance where carts won’t be everywhere and customers aren’t inconvenienced to the point of choosing a different store.
replies(1): >>42198965 #
1. permo-w ◴[] No.42198965[source]
I mean either way carts aren't gonna be everywhere, and I don't think pounds have ever been a problem for shoppers in the UK