←back to thread

168 points misternugget | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
rgrmrts ◴[] No.42198090[source]
I really like all the blog posts and videos the Zed team has put out, thank you if you’re reading this!

Unrelated to this specific post I’m such a fan of Zed. It’s the first feature complete text editor in recent memory that I’ve truly enjoyed using (i.e. it stays out of the way, is really fast, feels well engineered). I’m coming to Zed after years of Emacs which I still have love for but no longer feels like a competitive piece of software (it does not take full advantage of how good computers are today, e.g. gpu rendering or multicore). I really hope Zed stays a fast and lightweight text editor instead of becoming some bloated growth-at-all-cost VC ware (not that they’ve exhibited any signs of that happening). I’d also happily pay for Zed without a subscription based thing for access to LLM features (which I do not use).

replies(1): >>42198366 #
seanw444 ◴[] No.42198366[source]
> it does not take full advantage of how good computers are today, e.g. gpu rendering or multicore

Why does Emacs need that though? I hear people say this all the time and I don't get it. Multicore kind of works against the structure that Emacs touts as a feature. And GPU rendering? In many applications, I totally agree with these complaints. But it's a text editor.

I tried Zed myself, and it's good. But it doesn't dethrone Emacs (for me personally).

replies(4): >>42198660 #>>42198929 #>>42199042 #>>42201176 #
1. DrBenCarson ◴[] No.42198929[source]
“Need” is strong but using GPU rendering is definitely better than CPU rendering and makes things feel very snappy

Most new TTY projects use GPUs for that reason