←back to thread

581 points gnabgib | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
meetingthrower ◴[] No.42197376[source]
Yes but the algorithm also is that they take 5% of your assets each year. So if you've saved $1M (not much for a $200K a year couple in their 50s), that's $50K a year out the door.
replies(2): >>42197556 #>>42197595 #
robnado ◴[] No.42197595[source]
Honestly, that wouldn’t be a bad way to fund education: education is free, but the university gets taxation power over you so they can tax you at x% of your income. It aligns incentives better than the current system.
replies(1): >>42197922 #
Engineering-MD ◴[] No.42197922[source]
In which case you may like how it’s done in the UK. it’s technically debt but in essence works as a graduate tax. The government pays for your education with a loan. You then only pay back 9% of your income over a certain income threshold. You do this until you pay back the loan or 30-40 years have passed. So in practice this is a graduate tax.
replies(2): >>42198903 #>>42200679 #
1. __d ◴[] No.42198903{3}[source]
Australia does something similar (it's called HECS if you want to search for details).