←back to thread

736 points gnabgib | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
TheJoeMan ◴[] No.42197249[source]
This is a great step in the right direction. I can't speak directly for MIT, but there are issues with how these programs don't apply to parents with small family businesses. My parents had a small business, with my father taking home a salary of $XX,XXX. Duke University used the business assets to determine the EFC (expected family contribution) of literally 90% of the salary. Essentially saying to sell off the family business for the college fund, which was a non-starter.

Small businesses are allegedly the backbone of America, and I feel these tuition support programs overlook this segment of the middle-class.

replies(21): >>42197538 #>>42197658 #>>42198000 #>>42198518 #>>42198630 #>>42198802 #>>42199002 #>>42199120 #>>42199126 #>>42199269 #>>42199949 #>>42200245 #>>42200451 #>>42200630 #>>42200685 #>>42200902 #>>42201562 #>>42202117 #>>42202554 #>>42203243 #>>42205511 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.42197538[source]
It’s incredibly difficult to structure these rules in a way that doesn’t discriminate against small businesses while not opening a giant loophole for the rich.
replies(3): >>42198599 #>>42198632 #>>42198799 #
changoplatanero ◴[] No.42198599[source]
Why is the price you have to pay for something dependent on how much money your parents make? Feels so unfair
replies(2): >>42198688 #>>42198715 #
mh- ◴[] No.42198688[source]
In my opinion, you're reasoning about it incorrectly.

What if I said: the price is the same for everyone, but people with less access to money get proportionally more assistance paying that price?

replies(2): >>42198781 #>>42198891 #
1. feanaro ◴[] No.42198891[source]
So there is an upper limit, which is the real price?