←back to thread

113 points roboboffin | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.424s | source
Show context
outworlder ◴[] No.42198355[source]
So, an inherently error-prone computation is being corrected by another very error prone computation?
replies(3): >>42198861 #>>42198868 #>>42198986 #
1. sctb ◴[] No.42198868[source]
No problem, said von Neumann. https://www.scottaaronson.com/qclec/27.pdf
replies(2): >>42200875 #>>42200978 #
2. limit499karma ◴[] No.42200875[source]
what he actually said: "as long as the physical error probability ε is small enough" you can build a reliable system from unreliable parts.

So it remains for you to show that AI.ε ~= QC.ε since JvN proved the case for a system made of similar parts, that is vacuum tubes, with the same error probability.

(p.s. thanks for the link)

3. benreesman ◴[] No.42200978[source]
A quick careless Google didn’t yield Scott Aaronson’s take on this, which as a layperson is the one take I’d regard seriously.

Has he remarked on it and my search-fu failed?