←back to thread

212 points pseudolus | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.454s | source
1. kiru_io ◴[] No.42198734[source]
Google should vibe out others as well. If I search now "Best CBD Gummies", the first few results are: vice.com independent.co.uk healthline.com observer.com

How is Forbes worse than any of those shallow comparison pages?

replies(2): >>42198760 #>>42199413 #
2. glial ◴[] No.42198760[source]
FWIW, Kagi is a little better but not much. First results are:

* cornbreadhemp.com * forbes.com * healthline.com

replies(2): >>42199006 #>>42199455 #
3. al_borland ◴[] No.42199006[source]
Kagi does let the user adjust the rankings of these sites if they don't want them coming up. While it would be nice to have this done proactively for the link farms, at least the user does have some control.

Forbes did make it on the blocked and lowered leaderboards.

https://kagi.com/stats?stat=leaderboard

4. vasco ◴[] No.42199413[source]
Probably all ran by the same people too.
5. zappchance ◴[] No.42199455[source]
DDG gives me:

forbes.com healthline.com medicalnewstoday.com fortune.com

But I usually use site:reddit.com in my searches anyway so it doesn't matter to my personal habits.