←back to thread

Exploring the Cost and Feasibility of Battery-Electric Ships

(newscenter.lbl.gov)
32 points gnabgib | 1 comments | 20 Nov 24 16:52 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Already__Taken ◴[20 Nov 24 20:07 UTC] No.42197609[source]▶
I support this idea but I stopped reading when the costs factored included the social costs of CO2 emissions. which I'm sure are important, but shipping operates on the actual cost of fuel and equipment, until CO2 tax is in that aren't we just making up economics?

They're also factoring in the value of the batteries second life, which seems at best, speculative.

ships should be electric, they're filthy to be around with 24/7 diesel generators running even on the quayside. if ship electrification prompted better port facilities of shore side hookup just that would be a win.

replies(3): >>42197649 #>>42197659 #>>42198670 #
1. akira2501 ◴[20 Nov 24 22:14 UTC] No.42198670[source]▶
The reason those generators run is because the cargo requires them, or ships would not be able to take anything refrigerated or frozen, removing a large part of very profitable cargo from them. If the power to those boxes fails for a long enough period of time the load is completely destroyed.

Ships use power for all sorts of things. Steering, ventilation fans, and water pumps just to name a few. Motor power is only a fraction of what a boat can do, and most boats connect a generator to the main shaft, because the power is more important than the motive force.