←back to thread

68 points rbanffy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
DyslexicAtheist ◴[] No.42197320[source]
every other article these days on this site is about AI. And it's incredibly tedious and annoying.

Isn't it enough that clueless marketers who get their Tech knowledge from businessinsider and bloomberg are constantly harping on about AI.

Seems we as a community have resigned or given up in this battle against common sense. Maybe long ago. Still there should be some form of moderation penalizing these shill posts that only glorify AI as being the future, ... the same way that not everything about crypto or the blockchain ended up on the FP. Seems with AI we're looking the other way and are OK with it?

Or maybe it's me.

replies(9): >>42197353 #>>42197452 #>>42197618 #>>42198880 #>>42199154 #>>42201180 #>>42201763 #>>42201954 #>>42202029 #
dgfitz ◴[] No.42197353[source]
Nah, it’s not just you.

AI is really neat. I don’t understand how a business model that makes money pops out on the other end.

At least crypto cashed out on NFTs for a while.

replies(4): >>42197440 #>>42197446 #>>42197570 #>>42198330 #
svara ◴[] No.42198330[source]
> I don’t understand how a business model that makes money pops out on the other end.

What issues do you see?

I pay for ChatGPT and for cursor and to me that's money very well spent.

I imagine tools like cursor will become common for other text intensive industries, like law, soon.

Agreed that the hype can be over the top, but these are valuable productivity tools, so I have some trouble understanding where you're coming from.

replies(3): >>42198342 #>>42198406 #>>42198648 #
1. goatlover ◴[] No.42198648[source]
Question is whether these companies are profitable off the services they're providing, or still being propped up by all the VC money pouring in.