←back to thread

32 points LinuxBender | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
queuebert ◴[] No.42194825[source]
On a related note, I've always wondered if straight ahead 60 to 0 braking tests were relevant to anything. Not many accidents happen where a driver is just unable to completely stop and end up hitting the other car at 10 mph.

I would think the insurance companies could come up with a better braking test, like 60 to 40 with a swerve, where the suspension response factors in as well as both tire lateral and longitudinal grip.

replies(3): >>42195273 #>>42195696 #>>42198041 #
1. acdha ◴[] No.42198041[source]
I agree that more complicated tests are useful but you do get a lot of deaths where someone is cruising down the road and doesn’t see a stop sign, pedestrian, bicyclist, etc. and those are quite deadly due to that speed differential. Cell phones also make it more common for people to rear-end cars in simple usage, too.