←back to thread

50 points croes | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
dylan604 ◴[] No.42196863[source]
Did Coca-Cola sponser/fund this study? Why the need for the label still being visible? Seems like you'd want to not obstruct the view behind the label, you know, for science. There's zero purpose for having a bottle with any label. The shape of the bottle is part of their trade mark, so it would be obvious anyways.

Apparently, I'm really sick of constant bombardment from corporate branding.

replies(3): >>42197876 #>>42198836 #>>42200283 #
1. barbazoo ◴[] No.42197876[source]
Puzzling, I can see why a pop bottle, due to its shape, would make this more fun to look at than say a boring cylinder but why the free advertisement by leaving the label on?

It's not even that it's cola inside, obviously

> We use a collimated beam to illuminate a Coca-Cola bottle filled with water and a small amount of milk