Most active commenters
  • PittleyDunkin(3)

←back to thread

499 points perihelions | 24 comments | | HN request time: 1.091s | source | bottom
Show context
jmward01 ◴[] No.42197691[source]
Completely aside from the cable discussion, I'm glad this was on bsky. I could finally follow the comments in the link again. I hope this trend continues.
replies(3): >>42197801 #>>42197890 #>>42198168 #
1. FlyingSnake ◴[] No.42197801[source]
BlueSky has attained critical mass and it is the next generation of microblogging. We’re witnessing the long awaited dethroning of twitter and it will end up ceding the space like Reddit did.
replies(6): >>42197838 #>>42197961 #>>42197992 #>>42198007 #>>42198023 #>>42200580 #
2. SoftTalker ◴[] No.42197838[source]
Until users get disenchanted with it and move to the next thing....
replies(5): >>42197895 #>>42197911 #>>42197929 #>>42197956 #>>42198105 #
3. NovemberWhiskey ◴[] No.42197895[source]
Actually that bit I care less about.
4. moomin ◴[] No.42197911[source]
I never got disenchanted with Twitter. It got boring. If it had stayed the same I’d still be on there complaining about it.
replies(1): >>42198108 #
5. CalChris ◴[] No.42197929[source]
… which is the way it should be. Users vote with their fingers and eyeballs.
6. FlyingSnake ◴[] No.42197956[source]
That’s the whole point. These next gen protocols make it easy enough to move on to the next thing.
replies(1): >>42198933 #
7. mardifoufs ◴[] No.42197961[source]
I mean, it's still a very small niche website of again, mostly tech related westerners. Twitter is much more diverse
replies(2): >>42198045 #>>42198154 #
8. Postosuchus ◴[] No.42197992[source]
Nope. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
9. jonas21 ◴[] No.42198007[source]
What happened to Reddit? AFAIK, they're bigger than ever now.
replies(2): >>42198015 #>>42198039 #
10. ceejayoz ◴[] No.42198015[source]
In any of the larger subreddits, the posts are heavily repost bots and the top comments stolen from the last time it was posted.
replies(1): >>42198030 #
11. PittleyDunkin ◴[] No.42198023[source]
I think some of the community will also move to substack
replies(1): >>42198190 #
12. PittleyDunkin ◴[] No.42198030{3}[source]
It's also astroturfed to death, including moderation.
13. Cyph0n ◴[] No.42198039[source]
Astroturfing and moderator controlled subreddits have ruined Reddit for me. /r/worldnews is one example of the latter.
replies(2): >>42198132 #>>42200628 #
14. danielovichdk ◴[] No.42198045[source]
Diverse is probably a stretch.

More like an echo chamber for the choir preachers.

replies(1): >>42200236 #
15. rikthevik ◴[] No.42198105[source]
Yeah dude. There will be a next thing.

“Be like water making its way through cracks. Do not be assertive, but adjust to the object, and you shall find a way around or through it. If nothing within you stays rigid, outward things will disclose themselves.

Empty your mind, be formless. Shapeless, like water. If you put water into a cup, it becomes the cup. You put water into a bottle and it becomes the bottle. You put it in a teapot, it becomes the teapot. Now, water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend.”

- Bruce Lee

16. dragonwriter ◴[] No.42198108{3}[source]
Transitioning from not finding it boring to finding it boring is exactly being disenchanted with it.
17. jiggawatts ◴[] No.42198132{3}[source]
Someone analysed a popular post and found that 19 of the top 20 comments were bots.

The Dead Internet theory is all too true.

18. dogleash ◴[] No.42198154[source]
> very small niche website of again, mostly tech related westerners

That's what they want. A social club with an overton window they like.

It's designed for mass userbase so it can feel like a big party that "everybody" is at. But once "everybody" includes their parents then the party is over.

19. talldayo ◴[] No.42198190[source]
As an outsider, I've always associated Bluesky/Twitter with "volitile but potentially cutting-edge reporting" and followed it but with a grain of salt.

When I see an article on Substack I always assume the worst. The signal-to-noise ratio is lower on Medium and Substack than any other social platform I browse, which is a tragic indictment of where long-form blogging has gone.

replies(1): >>42198383 #
20. PittleyDunkin ◴[] No.42198383{3}[source]
As with all social media, it's about who you follow. I've found it particularly attractive for international reporting, albeit typically with some clear bent or polemic.
21. chx ◴[] No.42198933{3}[source]
Yes but bluesky does not let you do that!

https://pluralistic.net/2024/11/02/ulysses-pact/

22. mardifoufs ◴[] No.42200236{3}[source]
No it is just a lot more diverse. For example there's a big presence on twitter of Arab politics/politicians or for french rap, or even local Quebec politics. On bluesky it's mostly white dudes talking about tech or about twitter
23. IAmGraydon ◴[] No.42200580[source]
Not sure if you're being serious, but Reddit gets FAR more traffic than Twitter. Twitter is #43 out of all the sites on the internet in terms of traffic. Reddit is #10. Bluesky is not even on the map yet.
24. IAmGraydon ◴[] No.42200628{3}[source]
Reddit's become a propaganda factory, and it's disturbing. Heavily astroturfed subs are creating an echo chamber effect that's clearly damaging users' mental health. The platform's lax security makes it an easy mark for foreign misinformation campaigns. You can still sign up without even an email address!