←back to thread

150 points nalaginrut | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.537s | source
Show context
packetlost ◴[] No.42194716[source]
Oh wow I wish that font was even remotely readable
replies(20): >>42194747 #>>42194979 #>>42194995 #>>42195059 #>>42195265 #>>42195497 #>>42195578 #>>42195961 #>>42195979 #>>42196297 #>>42196715 #>>42196795 #>>42197427 #>>42197530 #>>42197589 #>>42198239 #>>42198381 #>>42205033 #>>42218658 #>>42298311 #
slater ◴[] No.42197530[source]
I know we're not supposed to go off on website stuff (per guidelines: "Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage") but jfc who thought this design was even remotely a good idea?
replies(1): >>42197664 #
1. mindcrime ◴[] No.42197664[source]
Somebody who doesn't want the same bland, boring, homogenized look that every other website in the world is using?

Personally I like a site that shows a bit of personality. It's quirky, but for an open source web framework written in Guile, it looks about perfect to me.

replies(1): >>42198061 #
2. viraptor ◴[] No.42198061[source]
I agree and it's a fun look. If anyone actually can't read it, the reader mode button is available and works just fine.