←back to thread

Yi Peng 3 crossed both cables C-Lion 1 and BSC at times matching when they broke

(bsky.app)
499 points perihelions | 1 comments | 20 Nov 24 06:56 UTC | HN request time: 0.216s | source
Show context
mitjam ◴[20 Nov 24 11:52 UTC] No.42193017[source]▶
It was crossing right on time for the interruptions, a Russian officer was on board, it slowed down while crossing, no other ships were slowing down in that area during that time (rulingnout headwinds) - it cannot get much clearer. China is now participating in hybrid warfare against Europe (unless they present stronger evidence against this assumption)
replies(6): >>42193083 #>>42193168 #>>42193187 #>>42193273 #>>42194394 #>>42194583 #
giraffe_lady ◴[20 Nov 24 14:53 UTC] No.42194394[source]▶
Why did they leave AIS on?
replies(1): >>42194440 #
diggan ◴[20 Nov 24 14:58 UTC] No.42194440[source]▶
Having AIS on is mandatory. I'm sure turning it off would raise even higher warning flags than just leaving it on while doing your shady stuff.

Regardless, there are satellites covering the area, so you wouldn't get rid of being tracked anyways, would just be a bit slower.

replies(4): >>42194473 #>>42194508 #>>42194556 #>>42194650 #
giraffe_lady ◴[20 Nov 24 15:21 UTC] No.42194650[source]▶
Every recreational sailor knows that AIS is "mandatory." It's completely routine to see commercial ships running without it.
replies(2): >>42194702 #>>42195097 #
WinstonSmith84 ◴[20 Nov 24 15:57 UTC] No.42195097[source]▶
With "commercial", I guess you imply fishing vessels doing this to go fishing outside their delimited area. That's different from a massive bulk carrier in the middle of the Baltic
replies(1): >>42196593 #
1. giraffe_lady ◴[20 Nov 24 18:06 UTC] No.42196593[source]▶
No I meant what I said. I've never seen a like supertanker without AIS but I've seen smaller cargo ships, ferries, and specifically in northern europe energy company tenders running without it.