←back to thread

32 points LinuxBender | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hnburnsy ◴[] No.42195148[source]
With all this added tech and safety systems, why is per capita traffic deaths rising since 2018 and the highest since 2009?

Is all the added expense and impact on the environment worth it? Is the cost ever a concern in these mandates?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_fatality_rate_...

replies(5): >>42195203 #>>42195257 #>>42195441 #>>42196025 #>>42197923 #
malfist ◴[] No.42195203[source]
Found this for you: https://stateline.org/2023/11/10/less-driving-but-more-death...

Basically, law enforcement switched from enforcing traffic laws to automated detriments like traffic cameras that don't have the same prevention effects

replies(1): >>42195622 #
hnburnsy ◴[] No.42195622[source]
Interesting, thx. The UK which supposedly has world leading road safety, traffic deaths have been flat since 2012 (don't see the per capita or per km\mi figures.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reported_Road_Casualties_Great...

replies(1): >>42196476 #
1. njb311 ◴[] No.42196476[source]
According to the source statistics at gov.uk there has been an 8% increase in vehicle miles but a 5% reduction in deaths over the period 2013–23. Unless you adjust for the increased miles travelled, I would say the stats are just showing annual variability.

Data sources/classifications for injuries are more open to question because, for example, it might be possible for a minor injury to not be included in a police report at the scene while presenting later at a hospital. However, using a consistent basis for the period, Seriously injured are down 10% and Slightly injured down 32%, without adjusting for the increase in miles.

As with any stats, though, you have to understand the detail to draw any conclusions.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/reported-road-casua...