←back to thread

How good are American roads?

(www.construction-physics.com)
193 points chmaynard | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jameshart ◴[] No.42194610[source]
This is a great analysis but it does focus exclusively on ‘roughness’, which is obviously important but isn’t the be-all-end-all of road quality.

One area I notice in particular that roads in the northeast US subjectively feel worse than Europe is in quality of road markings. Constant plow scraping and harsh salting seems to destroy markings.

I think it also shows up in the overall fit and finish of road infrastructure - edging and barriers, signage, lighting, maintenance of medians, how curbs and furniture contribute to junction legibility… and of course bridges.

One major reason is that European countries typically have national road agencies and consistent standards across the country (because, generally, smaller and less federal). US’s patchwork of federal, state and local road maintenance leads to vastly different budgets and department priorities across the network.

replies(9): >>42194735 #>>42194896 #>>42195496 #>>42196027 #>>42196214 #>>42196762 #>>42198273 #>>42199203 #>>42199580 #
js2 ◴[] No.42196027[source]
The reflectivity of the road markings in North Carolina—where plows are rarely used—is terrible, to the point that they are almost invisible on a rainy night, even on freshly painted roads. It's the worst of anywhere I've lived or driven in the U.S.

Relatedly, recently my wife mentioned seeing a vehicle with large boxes on each side and wondering what they were. From her description, I tracked down that they are a fleet maintained by a small company that measures road marking reflectivity:

https://www.beckenterprises.com/services/

So who knows, maybe NC is finally doing something about the road markings here.

replies(4): >>42196302 #>>42196442 #>>42196689 #>>42196872 #
tdeck ◴[] No.42196302[source]
What an interesting niche business! I love that the Software section of their homepage appears to be a screenshot of WordPress template source code.
replies(1): >>42196410 #
1. withinboredom ◴[] No.42196410[source]
That’s a stock image when you search for “code” available on almost any stock image provider.
replies(1): >>42196831 #
2. tdeck ◴[] No.42196831[source]
I figured something like that it's just a little bit funny.