←back to thread

61 points peutetre | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.599s | source
Show context
looofooo0 ◴[] No.42194458[source]
It is really a shame, that the west cannot build cheap infrastructure anymore.
replies(4): >>42194571 #>>42194951 #>>42194952 #>>42195851 #
TheOtherHobbes ◴[] No.42195851[source]
The UK did just fine with HS1 - built under budget - and the Elizabeth Line, which was over and late but has been a huge commercial and popular success.

HS2 is just a bad answer to the problems its trying to address.

replies(1): >>42196299 #
1. growse ◴[] No.42196299[source]
What's a better answer to freeing up WCML capacity?
replies(1): >>42197315 #
2. DrBazza ◴[] No.42197315[source]
Not telling potential contract bidders what the value of each contract is and then being surprised when they bid at that value.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/hs2-rishi-sun...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jun/07/hs2-the-zomb...

> Mr Holden also said HS1 was successful because the true budget was known to just “a handful of people”, while HS2 contractors inflated their prices once they saw the latter project’s true budget.

replies(1): >>42197345 #
3. growse ◴[] No.42197345[source]
You seem to be answering a different question.