←back to thread

61 points peutetre | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
paganel ◴[] No.42195932[source]
At this point wouldn't it be cheaper to just move the capital to somewhere in the Midlands, and in so doing hitting two birds with one stone? I.e. decongesting London and giving (back) lots of economic opportunities to Midlands itself (which seems like it got the shortest of sticks as a result of Britain's des-industrialisation) and even to Northern England. And I'm not just talking about moving some BBC offices and stuff like that, I'm talking about moving the whole damn thing, i.e. the Government and even the Parliament.

Otherwise the entire island of Britain (or the English part of it, at least) would be geared towards its South-Eastern corner only, and there's only so much that you can alleviate that by infrastructure works.

replies(1): >>42196121 #
1. roywiggins ◴[] No.42196121[source]
The Parliament building is literally falling down, so at least temporarily moving out to somewhere while they rebuild it has been proposed a few times. Probably it would take it actually burning down for MPs to leave.

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/127/public-accoun...

replies(1): >>42197382 #
2. inglor_cz ◴[] No.42197382[source]
Westminster burning down again would be high irony.

(The current building was erected after a devastating fire in 1834, caused by improper disposal of ancient tally sticks no less.)