←back to thread

540 points napolux | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
oxguy3 ◴[] No.42194617[source]
> The photo was taken about coordinates 50.29092467073664, 4.893099128823844 near modern Wallonia, Belgium on the Meuse River.

Great writeup, but I did have a little chuckle reading "it was taken about near here", followed by coordinates precise enough to identify a single atom. https://xkcd.com/2170/

replies(1): >>42194968 #
vardump ◴[] No.42194968[source]
Going to be a different atom once you walk near. Or temperature changes, the wind blows, and so on.

We’ll need to give each atom a unique ID. That would solve the problem.

replies(3): >>42195468 #>>42197415 #>>42199687 #
dylan604 ◴[] No.42195468[source]
IPv8 is accepting RFCs
replies(2): >>42195915 #>>42196078 #
1. Aerroon ◴[] No.42195915[source]
There are 10^80 atoms in the universe, therefore 266 bits are enough to give each a unique identifier. Due to how computers work maybe we can do two numbers: a 32-bit type or area code and a 256-bit counter. Or perhaps we just combine them into a single 272 or 288 or 320-bit number.
replies(2): >>42196109 #>>42196359 #
2. stackghost ◴[] No.42196109[source]
Time for Intel to climb out of the pit by introducing x86_266
3. ◴[] No.42196359[source]