←back to thread

FireDucks: Pandas but Faster

(hwisnu.bearblog.dev)
397 points sebg | 3 comments | 14 Nov 24 11:48 UTC | HN request time: 0.413s | source
Show context
OutOfHere ◴[20 Nov 24 16:12 UTC] No.42195321[source]▶
Don't use it:

> By providing the beta version of FireDucks free of charge and enabling data scientists to actually use it, NEC will work to improve its functionality while verifying its effectiveness, with the aim of commercializing it within FY2024.

In other words, it's free only to trap you.

replies(5): >>42195375 #>>42195631 #>>42197438 #>>42198018 #>>42204627 #
ladyanita22 ◴[20 Nov 24 16:16 UTC] No.42195375[source]▶
Important to upvote this. If there's room for improvement for Polars (which I'm sure there is), go and support the project. But don't fall for a commercial trap when there are competent open source tools available.
replies(2): >>42195517 #>>42195828 #
1. binoct ◴[20 Nov 24 16:54 UTC] No.42195828[source]▶
No shade to the juggernaut of the open source software movement and everything it has/will enabled, but why the hate for a project that required people’s time and knowledge to create something useful to a segment of users and then expect to charge for using it in the future? Commercial trap seems to imply this is some sort of evil machination but it seems like they are being quite upfront with that language.
replies(2): >>42196042 #>>42196043 #
2. floatrock ◴[20 Nov 24 17:11 UTC] No.42196042[source]▶
It's not hate for the project, it's hate for the deceptive rollout.

Basically it's a debate about how many dark patterns can you squeeze next to that "upfront language" before "marketing" slides into "bait-n-switch."

3. papichulo2023 ◴[20 Nov 24 17:12 UTC] No.42196043[source]▶
Not sure if evil or not, but it is unprofessional to use a tool that you dont know how much it will cost for your company in the future.