←back to thread

32 points LinuxBender | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
queuebert ◴[] No.42194825[source]
On a related note, I've always wondered if straight ahead 60 to 0 braking tests were relevant to anything. Not many accidents happen where a driver is just unable to completely stop and end up hitting the other car at 10 mph.

I would think the insurance companies could come up with a better braking test, like 60 to 40 with a swerve, where the suspension response factors in as well as both tire lateral and longitudinal grip.

replies(3): >>42195273 #>>42195696 #>>42198041 #
1. toast0 ◴[] No.42195696[source]
A 60 to 0 braking test gives you a floor on the braking distance.

You've got to add safety factors from there. Reaction time, road conditions, vehicle condition, steering inputs, etc.

But also, a brake test with a swerve is going to be a lot less repeatable, because the driver input is more complex.